Actions

The bugtracker and git: Difference between revisions

From LimeSurvey Manual

No edit summary
 
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
2. Bug assigned to developer (by the developer himself or someone else)
2. Bug assigned to developer (by the developer himself or someone else)


3. Bug fixed in fork on github.com (each developer has his own fork?)
3. Bug fixed github.com


4. Pull request generated on github.com
4. Issue assigned to LimeSurvey repository owner (c_schmitz), status set to resolved.


5. Issue assigned to LimeSurvey repository owner (c_schmitz), status set to resolved.
5. When a new version is released c_schmitz closes the resolved bugs.
 
6. Pull request fulfilled and bug status set to closed (done by c_schmitz)


This method of working should allow for efficient bug fixing with multiple developers without getting c_schmitz overworked..?
This method of working should allow for efficient bug fixing with multiple developers without getting c_schmitz overworked..?


Please respond on what you think of this process, or what should be changed.
Please respond on what you think of this process, or what should be changed.

Revision as of 14:40, 9 August 2012

This article should help developers on the LimeSurvey when resolving issues.

General process outline.

1. Bug reported by user.

2. Bug assigned to developer (by the developer himself or someone else)

3. Bug fixed github.com

4. Issue assigned to LimeSurvey repository owner (c_schmitz), status set to resolved.

5. When a new version is released c_schmitz closes the resolved bugs.

This method of working should allow for efficient bug fixing with multiple developers without getting c_schmitz overworked..?

Please respond on what you think of this process, or what should be changed.